Texas has always been known for its big personality. From the music and food to the sense of pride and independence, everything is BIG in Texas, the ranches, the barbequed ribs, the belly laughs. Texans love their identity. TEXIT, the novel builds on this pride by asking how a state might take its sense of self a step further, through independence.
But the story goes deeper. It’s not just about land or law. It’s about the people. About what it means to feel connected to a place and want a bigger voice in shaping it.
The characters in TEXIT: The Hour of Our Disunion face challenges, both personal and political. Some wrestle with change. Others push for it. Some are caught in between. This mirrors real life. As readers follow their journey, they might start to wonder:
These aren’t easy questions, but the book doesn’t try to answer them for you. It gives you the space to think.
One of the best things about TEXIT is how it explores the idea of independence without promoting division. The book doesn’t attack. It reflects. It looks at what self-governance could mean in a peaceful, respectful way. In case you haven’t noticed, and it behooves each to note, our neighbourhoods are changing.
Texit is more than a story about a state. It’s about people. It’s about questioning things, like the future, in a calm, thoughtful way. Solution-based repartee minus the hysteria is the foundation for change or reaffirmation.
It invites readers to reflect on:
At its heart, Texit: The Hour of Our Disunion is a fictional story, but its questions are very real. The book encourages readers to be more aware, engaged, and thoughtful.
TEXIT: The Hour of Our Disunion offers a pause in a world where change feels faster than ever. A moment to imagine, to wonder, and to think differently. It reminds us that ideas—big or small—shape our future. Sometimes, all it takes is one story to start a new conversation. It doesn’t preach. It prompts.
And maybe that’s what we need more of—books that ask questions instead of giving answers.
Be safe and be happy, Bruce & Barbara McNabb
The Framers of the Constitution envisioned that state governments, not the national government, would be the main unit of government.
